MUHAMMAD ARBI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Contract Act 1872 Section 74 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Treaty Re-scrutinizing the evidence by the Supreme Court Penalty Clause stipulates that the tree's value will be calculated by cutting down the number of trees in the specified area. ? The value of the tree was deducted by the claimant, with the value of the tree not being more than ten times the value of the tree to which it was not entitled to ten percent of the tree, its value was levied on the plaintiff in addition to the sale. The trees were dismissed by the trial court of the plaintiff. However, the appellate court reduced the penalty from ten times to five times the plaintiff's second appeal was dismissed by the High Court in proving the actual loss to defendant by cutting unauthorized trees from his trees. Was unsuccessful. Due to the reduction in fines, reasonable compensation was first settled by the High Court, no evidence was presented to prove the actual or proper amount of compensation, which has been decided by the two courts below. But re-examination of the evidence was not guaranteed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Tando Jam lawyer