Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE

Testimony of Sections 2302 and 4304, Part I, was not available to witnesses at the time of the hearing and the accused requested to kill both the deceased under the tomb and sudden provocation led to private and semen secretions. The absence of parts of the victim was not enough to destroy the defense version so the conviction of the accused was changed from crime v22, PPC to section 4 304, Part I, PP: C and sentenced to five years imprisonment. Was sentenced. On each count, the fine amounting to Rs 2,000, 2,000, along with the direction that the sentence was to be permanently executed, was waived, as the condition of the two victims is poor. top advocates from Patika lawyer