Find a Lawyer

SIDDIQAN versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM

Section 16 of the Contract Act 1872 document was allegedly executed by a scandalous / illiterate woman, and the person benefiting from such document had the authority of a lawyer and was required to take advantage of the document to make such irrevocable testimony. The source must prove that such a woman / woman had implemented the document under question. In order to fully understand such document and the accused attorney has the right to sell the property to the beneficiaries of the said document, the alleged attorney has only asserted the authority's authority and claimed it himself and registered cell No attempt was made in the deadline, for lack of such evidence to be used by a party to prove that the relevant women had understood and understood the contents and its effect. In the presence of a special power of attorney allegedly executed by the relevant women, Section 16, a contract T, 1872, clearly displeased the supply. The power of the attorney, which is a clear violation of the principle of the Protectorate, was not restricted to such women as the available tune was available to foreign / illiterate women. top advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer