Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF versus AKHTAR ALI

Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 21 of the landlord's personal need were decided in favor of the landlord while the issue decided in payment of rent was decided by the rent controller in favor of the tenant. Which stated that the landlord had failed to prove default. The landlord did not file a cross-appeal nor did the controller of the rent express any cross objection against the tenant's finding. Because of this, he used to fight for the landlord's right to vote with the rent controller and because he had neither filed a cross appeal nor could have objected to the rent. The finding of the tenant in the default case, which was decided without cross-objections and cross-appeal against the tenant, should not have been considered if the landlord defaulted. If you want to challenge the hiring controller's search, a counter action or counter object must be filed. ask a advocate free from Mehrab Pur lawyer