MERAJ KHALID versus ASHIQ ALI DIAL
Representation of the Public Act 1976 Section 83 The previous election candidate's non-refund of election expenses claims that during the subsequent election campaign meetings, he had brought in light of the respondent's failure to submit a return for election expenses. And he said that the disqualification had taken place, which attracted the idea of casting the vote; the demand of the applicant who was entitled to be declared as a returning candidate was not enough. Should have presented serious evidence in support of this claim. , Failed to prove that the defendant's alleged disqualification was sufficiently notorious for requesting a voting theory.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Yazman Mandi lawyer
