Find a Lawyer

FAIZ versus NIZAMUDDIN

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant had failed to pay according to the terms of the agreement between the defendants, claiming that he was forcibly placed on the contract under the terms of the agreement. Was made to sign, but for the bare allegation, the defendant's coercion failed to produce any evidence to substantiate the allegation of coercion; if there was any truth to the allegation, the defendant, in general, Immediately after his execution, the contract denied, Hutt did not do so, by the plaintiff in evidence of his claim. Or witness. , Not only was the plaintiff's statement confirmed by the plaintiff, but it was also to counter the cross-examination of the plaintiff's facts that the agreement was voluntarily signed by the parties, based on the plaintiff's claim specifically on the basis of the agreement and Based on this was proved. Evidence of the defendant's testimony famous high court advocate from Hub Inds Estate lawyer