The Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 section 15 (2) (ii), in the payment of the tenant, argued that it did not pay the landlord the disputed rent, as the landlord rented at a better rate. Demanded and thus there was no forced default, if the landlord had demanded the rent at an increased rate as the tenant had stated, the tenant could send the rent at the current rate through a money order or If the court can submit to the tenant, it fails to follow one of the two options available to the tenant, depending on the tenant's Was temporarily voluntarily. However, the demand for higher rent cannot be considered by the landlord an act of self-pity.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 1993
