MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAY HEADQUARTERS, LAHORE
R19 (3) Appeal restitution that was excluded by default / The initial date of hearing of the Appellant's Appeal was made either intentionally or intentionally on 27 1 1993, when its application The case was adjourned and was reunited on 22 199 1993. , He was fully aware of the date of the regular hearing that in the absence of an appeal restoration case, the application was dismissed by him. R 19 (3) Appeal for reinstatement of appeal was submitted by request for postponement of the hearing of the restitution petition by a lawyer who did not have the authority to file on file, while the lawyer The authority of attorney was on file and the person who argued the appeal for admission was not allowed to make any other adjustments and the appeal was sought to be restored by the lawyer requesting the court to appear / adjourn. Delegated based on arguments
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
