MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus THE STATE
Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Medical examination of the prosecutor claiming to be praised for self-virginity revealed that she was addicted to racial homosexuality, her hymen's tears were old and vaginal ease. Two fingers were inserted from the lady doctor's vaginal arrest was not presented in the evidence except that on the record of the prosecutor's statement alone, there was nothing available on the record that raped her by the accused. Was filed, the FIR dismissal filed by the prosecutor was present between the parties in the present complaint. The filing also showed that - was not based on the fact that charges against the accused, the accused was acquitted by my circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer
