MUZAFFAR ALI JAWA versus D.C.
The Punjab Local Councils (vote of no confidence against the chairman or vice chairman) Rules 1980 R 3 The authority to approve the meeting through a no-confidence motion against the chairman's request was a legal task and the members submitted it. Had to go No doubt the convening authority is required to convene a meeting, so it was a right to inquire into the satisfaction of its sovereignty, or to obtain the signatures, but the days mentioned in R 3 day meeting. It was not a prerequisite for seeking a period of time during which the Authority was to convene a meeting, but there was no absolute restriction in calling a meeting on the first day of submission of the application.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Tobatek Singh lawyer
