SARWAT ARA versus SABRA KHATOON
Limitation Act 1908 Article 142 The case for possession of immovable property from which the claimant was transferred was between the two parts of the boundary plot plot, and he also created shops which were leased to the tenant by the plaintiff. It did not raise any objection to the action taken by defendant until 1968, when it filed a lawsuit for declaration and injunction. It was eventually dismissed when the plaintiff had to file a case for eviction / occupation against the defendant in 1959, when it learned that the illegal construction of a residential area, partition walls and shops were made illegal. When I caused the defendant to file a lawsuit, the withdrawal / seizure was born in 1959, which was filed in 1979, under section 142, the time limit banned under the Act, 1908.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Pasni lawyer