West Pakistan Stabilization Holding Ordinance 1960 Section 10 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 arbitrary relief The procedure to prevent the applicant from giving relief in the discretionary jurisdiction, before the applicant's appeal and the Board of Revenue before the Additional Commissioner. This review was unsuccessful. In the constitutional petition, the Stability Scheme's request was confirmed that the respondents should be barred from seeking land and restoration of status quo until the decision of the constitutional application was passed and prevented the respondents from separating the land. Went to what was given to them. In the Stability Scheme, the respondents have a preliminary objection that the applicant had set aside a part of the holding during the approval of the constitutional application and thus obstructed the discretion of the constitutional jurisdiction which resulted in the party. There was a dispute between the two countries. Solidarity Action The applicant was obliged to uphold what was assigned to him in the stability proceedings, so that in the event of the success of his constitutional petition, the rights of the parties could be adjusted and Prior to stabilization the position was separated and restored. Part of its holding made it impossible for the parties to reinstate themselves in a position of stability that the applicant himself had temporarily obtained a restraining order to prevent the respondents from separating from their holding. It was all the more important to maintain the position that the applicant was not entitled. Arbitrary relief in constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
