MUHAMMAD JAVED versus STATE
Special Courts for Section 12 (3) and 1 Speedy Trials (Amendment) Ordinance (XIX of 1988) of the Speedy Trials Act 1987, Supreme Court failure to amend subsection (3) of Section 12, Special Courts for Special Courts The Special Appeals Act, 1987, contained an error on the part of the legislature that twice failed to find a contradiction, saying that in such circumstances, subordinate (3) sustained court could substitute and rectify the error. , Not according to language and spirit. Appeals to the Supreme Court for the Special Courts for the Special Courts Under the Speed Trials Act 1987, therefore, he did not lie.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Shakargarh lawyer