ANWARI KHANUM SHAIKH versus PASSCON (PVT.) LTD.
The CPC's appearance and non-appearance of the CCC results in the implementation of O IX, R 13 and IX, R 13, the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, considering only two conditions in which the former Orders can be ordered to be approved. That is, where the defendant was not served. And where the defendant had shown sufficient reason by which he was barred from attending, the court or filing of his written statement, where the defendant was served, engaged with a lawyer who appeared for him. And after that neither the lawyer appeared, nor the defendant appeared personally, the IGF, R13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, under O IX, was not guaranteed to reject the previous party decree, which is expected on the due dates. Approved because of the absence of a lawyer and defendant. It is the party's responsibility not to forget the case after engaging a lawyer. To uphold itself at various stages in the case and to have its lawyer neglect to follow the case, OIX, R 13, was not entitled to any wrongdoing under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer