GULZAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) The Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Definitions of Sections 314 and 315 The trial court erred in relying on the defendant's statement before the police, which was admissible in evidence. And may not have been charged with not taking any particular piece of evidence - or investigating or defending yourself on an oath to deny the allegations and allegations leveled against you. I have to examine a witness and the prosecutor was obliged to prove his case through his own evidence. Defendant's borrowing of evidence also contradicts the evidence of the prosecution in which the accused was acquitted in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Karore Lalisan lawyer
