FAROOQ HASSAN versus RIZWANA SYED
Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 S16 (1) (2) invading the tenant's defense, which failed to submit the rent and future rent arrears in compliance with the temporary control order of the tenant. Nevertheless, a dismissal order was approved against them. The tenant did not file objections to the petition filed by the landlord for the defense of the tenant, only saying that he could not comply with the rent controller's order as he was in jail at the time the tenant deposited the money. Was able to comply with the temporary rental order by arranging the rental. The rental and future rent arrears through the tenant's Advocate Defense were, in the circumstances, subject to a non-compliance with the temporary rental order approved by the Rent Controller.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Lodhran lawyer
