AHMAD ZAMAN KHAN, BARRISTER versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Civil Procedure Code I Order CPC parties to include or exclude suits OI, R 10 from a party's plaintiffs 'argument that they have the authority to place only the individual, the corporate body or an organization in the defendants' row. Or demanding that it be removed, and that the court could not stand in its way, because the plaintiff had no compulsion in that regard, and that the plaintiff did not have the legality to which he proceeded. Was, will be overcome: the wrong court which was seized for some reason. Control the litigation and place it according to the law The plaintiff cannot be allowed to hoodwink the law of the court or the process of abuse to provide for his personal interests if the court lies in it, and It has nothing to do with it. The proper basis and the defendant has established the strength of its evidence as to which of the defendants has to suffer and is considered as a court of liability for consideration of equality. , It may not be inclined to process its disk. Responding in favor of the plaintiff, refusing to grant or grant any interim relief, was initially sought to be dismissed by the plaintiff without any explanation for the party in the case so that it could be offered. As to how the unnecessary party had since become, government-related, who was accused of making provocative entries against the plaintiff, unless heard, could not be directed to rectify any mistake. Is. This person, being an integral part of the lawsuit, cannot be removed from being named by the plaintiff.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
