Find a Lawyer

FATEH MUHAMMAD versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

Displaced persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 10 and 11 Settlement Scheme No. VIII, Para 1 An applicant occupied various parts in his possession The application for transfer of applicants was rejected on the basis of respondents. Ali / mosque was paying rent and thus he was the defendant's tenant and was not eligible for transfer of receipts issued by the defendant to the applicants, which shows that they were for payment of the donation. And they were not rented, the construction of a mosque over the vacant property was not valid and the rent of the property was made. The defendant's privilege to claim that the mosque was an act which did not create a favor for the mosque could not deprive applicants of their rights under the law, especially when the defendant had There was no title to the land on which the alleged construction took place. Any such possession has been taken to benefit, in accordance with the law, entitled to its transfer law firms from Hazro lawyer