Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHID versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

Section 10 and 11 of the Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, Pakistan (1973), rejecting the petition of the Article 199 Inquiry, both the illegal prosecution and the merit presented evidence in the separation and support of the improper order. Time allowed to allow. The contents of the information request were also excluded. None of the applicants was present on the date of the hearing. One of the applicants was directed by the court to appear on the hearing date but failed to appear. The lawyer appearing for the petitioner did not help the court and he left there in the court room without disclosing any reason why he was not appearing in the court, therefore, the petitioner and his lawyer In the absence, no alternative to proceedings could be found in connection with the order passed by the court. Can. Legal and merely competent, the ruling did not deal with or challenge the court's challenged results and arguments about eligibility. The concluding finding was not correct or unless the court had the power to modify its order, it could not have specified the order passed on the goodwill so no changes were made and , Thus, certified best law firm from Blitang lawyer