MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, PAK. RAILWAYS
Railways Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 Schedule V, R 2 (2) and (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) allowed for appeal to be dismissed from employment. Whether the Divisional Engineer is a Grade 18 Officer, was not able to issue a charge sheet to the applicant who was a Grade 12 Railway employee and whether the list of powers / authorized officers in the Department Head of Department R2 in Grade 19 Accordingly, in the case of the applicant, the competent officer was (2) and (3), Railway Servant (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1975 as shown in Schedule V, thus, the whole proceedings were carried out without any Offering jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Qasba Gujrat lawyer
