SECRETARY; COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, LAHORE versus RIAZ AHMAD
Soon, Part I, R 9 civilian extraordinary leave-counting periods for civil servants' salaries, which the government employee wanted to count toward increases, fell between 11 12 1980 (when he relinquished the charge of office. And their rehabilitation date 12 11 The first part of this period between 1980 and 21 12 1982 cannot be counted as an increment because the civil servant is also abstaining from his position and thus his absence. Cannot be understood for reasons beyond their control. 1982 and the date of rehabilitation, the public servant reported for duty on 12 12 1982, the department did not withdraw it, thus, falling between 22 12 1982 and its maintenance was out of the control of the government employee whose So they should be allowed. To count such a portion of his extraordinary departure towards the rise
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kallat lawyer