MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MAHMUD KHALID
Punjab Local Councils (Election Petitions) Rules 1979 Rrr (()) and (a) Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979 1979), Section 24 Election Petition shortening the applicant's election petition for rejection. Was rejected as having the documents associated with the election request was not signed and endorsed by the applicant as per the electoral tribunal under R9 (A), Punjab Local Councils (Election Petitions) Rules 1979. The order passed by the order showed that it was not constrained by the legal requirements. The Election Tribunal heard on the petition that the same election treble. Winnell mechanically rejected the election record by rejecting the execution record, rejecting the election request, and making these documents a supplement or schedule of election request. In the meaning of R5 (3) and whether R9 (A) ), Be a directory of the provisions of the Punjab Local Councils (Elections Petitions) Rules, 1979, or the arbitrary order under which the election petition was regressed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kurram Agency lawyer