Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

JAN MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL


The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 452/149 and 147 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 439, were the same dwelling of the accused against the accused, and therefore it cannot be said that a criminal offense was committed. Were not charged. The complainant and other prosecution witnesses and therefore cannot be prosecuted under these allegations, the prosecutor's witnesses made baseless corrections to their statements before the trial court's ocular testimony was not based on medical evidence. Yes, no weapons of crime were recovered from the accused. The statements of the accused under Section 2342, CRPC, were violated Section 646464, CRPC and the unauthorized opportunity was found, the accused was properly acquitted, under which the appellate court reviewed. The request was deleted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.