INDUS GLASS WORKS LIMITED versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction The constitutional application for restoration property was claimed not only by the applicant but also by the respondent (complainant), as well as the Government and Cantonment Board related High Court exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. Does not work. Being a court of fact and they do not have to enter into and dispose of disputed questions of fact, it can interfere with the finding of fact given by a subordinate court or tribunal or other authority if the finding is based on any evidence. Was not on or based on anyone. The complete misinterpretation of the evidence, where controversial questions of fact and law that require inquiry, were borne out for consideration, would not be appropriate for a decision to be made under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
