Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR KHAN versus NIAZ MUHAMMAD

Article 212 (3) was granted leave of appeal to examine questions of law of public importance, namely, that legislative assemblies or ministers work in the jurisdiction and jurisdiction for appointments at government offices and positions. However, they cannot interfere with the rights of public servants. However, they must adhere to the procedures laid down for the appointment of public servants. Whether, in the context of this matter, public representatives may be construed as violating the law of the land, the Service Tribunal was justified in expressing the opinion that the "representative of a governmental obligation" act / waiver through In this case, there was a need to perform other functions besides them. Whether, in this case, his conduct was an example of unnecessary interference in the affairs of government officials \ if the observations and consequences of the service tribunal have been maintained in relation to the dismissal of a civil servant, ask a advocate free from Madinah lawyer