JAMAL DIN versus HASSAN DIN
Due to such delays, the appellate court rejected the appeal because of the limitation of the restriction of the limitation Act 1908 Section 5 and Article 164 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OV, R17. Is shown. Summons sought by his affidavit, before the report, he is calling himself defective and the appellate court has failed to consider any question with the extension and delay of time, he dismissed the appeal. Demonstrated material irregularities in banning the use of. , The time began to move when he knew the decree against him
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Mastoi lawyer
