Sections 17 and 24 of the Cantonment Rent Regression Act 1963 provided the tenant's son, who resided with him on the basis of the settlement, had told the court if the landlord abandoned his claim for rent arrears. So he will evacuate the premises and hand it over to him. Such a statement of the landlord tenant was also signed by the tenant court counsel and accordingly the order of eviction against the tenant was approved and accordingly the tenant challenged the eviction order against him. What was the deal between his son and the house and he was not a tenant. When he recorded the compromise between his son and the landlord, neither he was present nor made any personal statement, yet his son's statement was signed by his lawyer, who did not object. It was a matter of the tenant that he had no authority to compromise with the tenant. Not that his son had fraudulently or collectively appealed against the tenant's controller order by the tenant. The idea was to frustrate any legal agreement between the parties
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
