MUHAMMAD HANIF ALIAS BHUTTO versus THE STATE
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Adultery of the adulteress Bill Complainant and his family There was no previous hostility from the accused or his family to the accusation that the accused was involved in his pending demand. Was. Rs 3,000 from the complainant. This did not seem to be true and even if it was accepted at its expense, the complainant would have no reason to risk the honor of his virgin daughter and his family. His involvement in the rape case was not truly justified, and the result of the chemical inspector's analysis of vaginal shrubs and the appearance of semen on the shalwar was the result of Zinc Bil Jaber's suspicion with his ocular. Was confirmed to be out. The testimony is accurate and the victim is convicted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Tarmatan lawyer
