Find a Lawyer

ARZ MUHAMMAD UMRANI, ASSISTANT POLITICAL AGENT, DERA BUGTI versus ATTA MUHAMMAD

Prior to the exercise of the powers of the High Court on an order approved by an officer in the exercise of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 77 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 197 Judicial / Judicial Duties. Inquired Under Article 199 of the Constitution High Court, examining the said order, it was found that the order was passed by an officer who relied on the provisions of the law, which was no longer on the law book, but was rejected. In fact, the case was pending before that. Another forum, which was the authorized forum, the fact that the officer was aware that such matters had raised the mind of the High Court that this officer was working for the Malala High Court keeping in view all these situations. , Remarked that the relevant officer was not a suitable person who could be given the option of exercising judicial or judicial duties. Standing under the order of the interrogating officer before the High Court, no exception can be accepted, the matter related to the High Court hearing on the High Court was not irrelevant to the inquiry. The High Court's observations did not arise because the order of the officer was postponed to the High Court and its legal status and validity were being examined under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), and such situation I was not like that. The author of the Order Principals issued under Sections 77, PPC and 197, CRPC, is required to hear that no officer has any responsibility for acting in the judicial capacity, in the circumstances Will not be attracted to it. pakistani advocates Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer