MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus ABDUL HAMID
The pre-emption section, sections 6, 6 and 7 of the Punjab Pre-Amendment Act, 1913, although the property in dispute had come into municipal limits, but there was nothing in the record that it had taken the property of a real estate citizen so that it could be considered a property. May already be excused. The notification should have been issued either under section 7 of the Act, 1913, or evidence should be given that the principal acquisition of a large portion of the same residents with a common interest in agriculture and in the common interest. Were associated, as were the characteristics of the countryside. Record of large areas of agricultural land, common village population or village officers and rights
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer
