Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM ALI versus PAKISTAN


Railway Servant (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1961 R 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The person who submitted the charge sheet related to the employee and ordered an investigation against him was eligible to do so. Was given full opportunity to participate in the investigation. He took advantage of this opportunity and examined the witnesses in his defense when the employee received another showcase notice and was given another chance to clear his position. This applies to service rules against the fact that employees were not personally heard by the appellate authority. There was no provision for the employee under which he had to be personally heard by the appellate authority. The employee did not even demand a personal hearing from the appellant in his memorandum, therefore the dismissal of the employment could not be excluded as the employees did not have a personal hearing.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Shadiwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.