Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAJJID ALI ASIF versus MUMTAZ AHMAD


Arts 75 and 76 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0,111; R2 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 554 for sale by a person who claims to have a power of attorney with an owner. Implementation of the process refuses to execute any lawyer in favor of the said person. Photostat copied to court, in the absence of originality, cannot be held that the person holding the requisite authority did not appear in the court to sue the plaintiff (vendor). That he admits in his statement before the court that the original power of attorney was not provided to the attorney at the time of the execution of the contract of sale, so was the power of attorney, based on the forged document and the sale. The executing person, the owner (the plaintiff), was not authorized to perform any sale by the seller. As such, the action taken in favor of the trader's claimant was not valid

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Kakul lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.