SAJJID ALI ASIF versus MUMTAZ AHMAD
Arts 75 and 76 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0,111; R2 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 554 for sale by a person who claims to have a power of attorney with an owner. Implementation of the process refuses to execute any lawyer in favor of the said person. Photostat copied to court, in the absence of originality, cannot be held that the person holding the requisite authority did not appear in the court to sue the plaintiff (vendor). That he admits in his statement before the court that the original power of attorney was not provided to the attorney at the time of the execution of the contract of sale, so was the power of attorney, based on the forged document and the sale. The executing person, the owner (the plaintiff), was not authorized to perform any sale by the seller. As such, the action taken in favor of the trader's claimant was not valid
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Attock lawyer
