TANVEER AHMAD QURESHI versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
The important question that needs to be considered is the redistribution of the groups of the chief services superiors under the jurisdiction of the High Court Powers, Section 4 (1) (b) of the Arts 199 and 212 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973). Not that the defendants were appropriate or not for re-allocation to the group but that, after the re-allocation appointment, they may be subject to the terms and conditions of service, which were approved by the Federal Public Service Commission Federal Service Tribunal. Can revert to this original group allotted to them. After detecting such a situation, it can qualitatively resolve the question which has led the respondents to re-allocate to professional groups, the constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution Article 1212 of the Constitution I was disqualified for the specific bar I was present in, while rejecting the constitutional disclaimer, the petition states that once a specific group was assigned to Central Superior Services, successful CA
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
