AKHATAR ALAM versus HINDUSTAN SANITARY AND DRAINAGE WORKS
OXXX, R2 (3), violation of the terms of section 144 and 151 provisional injunction prohibiting respondent / plaintiff appellant's shop tenants from closing shop doors and public fit Plaintiffs filed a declaration, order dismissal and dismissal against appellant landlords for obstructing the path, removing the barriers created by the defendants / appellants in this case and preventing them from obstructing or obstructing the shop. I also prayed in the decree. The defendants / appellants have also filed an application to prevent the defendant / plaintiff from being evicted. On the premises of the gates and windows of the tenant shops, the respondents, on this request, promised that they would not take the law into their own hands and would not resort to throwing applicants through illegal means. Upon the demolition of an officer of the Armed Municipal Corporation, the police party smashed the shutters of the applicants' shops and kept the applicants in illegal practice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
