MUHAMMAD FAROO0 versus THE STATE
The charges against the Pakistan Penal Code Section 468 Anti-Corruption Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the accused were that Patwari Halika had fraudulently issued a copy of the land after receiving money as bribe. The complainant himself stated in cross-examination that he allegedly did not pay the bribe to the accused, but the accused had already been transferred from the lighter and there was no evidence that the accused had committed fraud. The document was not sent to the handwriting expert, but the accused was sent to the accused after his transfer to the same death. The one released after comparing it with the record, it has been fully proved that the accused have released the documents according to the record, after comparing the same case with the same accused without suspicion, An appeal was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Baroute lawyer