ARSHAD MAHMOOD versus PAK KASHMIR MACHES FACTORY, MIRPUR
CPC Appearance and Non-Presidential Results of Civil Procedure Code Order IX O IX, Rr 3, 4, 8, 9 & 13; A XLIII, R 1 (c) and Section 115 Neither Plaintiff nor Plaintiff Appeared when a dismissal hearing was sought to qualify for an unlawful prosecution review, neither party appeared when a lawsuit was called for O IX, R 3, civil procedure delivery hearing ? Code, 1908, was drawn and O IX was not supplied with R 8, which was applicable when the defendant appeared and the defendant failed to appear, where the case was dismissed when both parties failed to appear. , The plaintiff can take advantage of the treatment provided under O. IX, R 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, for maintenance of suit. In the event of its failure, the High Court may request interference with the use of its scope of review, however, under the provisions of OIX, R8, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the order to dismiss Was approved under. Will be submitted under R9, Oxley, RL (C), CPC where request for order restoration or removal order is rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
