Find a Lawyer

RASHID AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2302/34 34 Definition of evidence was not a motive compiled by the prosecution. The eyewitness witnesses made unreliable improvements and their testimony did not encourage trust. The recoveries had no identifiable value, according to ocular testimony, the prosecutor deliberately suppressed the wounds of the manipulators, and an FIR was added to present additional prescriptions and the medical evidence suspect. The incident was acknowledged but in a different way and in its statements it was fully stated Without admitting and examining the accused, the suspect was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt, according to which Section 302/34 injured witness is not always correct that the injured prosecutor's witness will speak the truth [witness] solicitors from Deh Pathaan lawyer