GULZAR AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 section 13 denies the title of a tenant tenant landlord and seeks to acquire the dominant title holder of the property, by the landlord, after the landlord has constructed it. The title could not be denied to the tenant. By appearing in favor of an unusual title, the tenancy under the landlord cannot be terminated except when it is necessary to protect yourself from evicting the premises, however, The tenant must have acted under compulsion and the imminent danger of eviction, in the absence of such fact, was the voluntary acquisition of the tenant by the tenant with the unusual title of the tenancy between him and his landlord. Could not be terminated when the tenant controller at the time had no pending execution request and the tenant could not be a non-awardee. Used to get along The request for any eviction proceedings to prosecute the landlord was issued only a lengthy basis for the contempt of court to enable the tenant to enter into a tenancy agreement directly with the payroll holder. Not made, during the execution proceedings against the tenant, the petitioner's objection to the title of Permanent that he was the tenant's landlord was rejected. The virtue and the order was finalized that it was not challenged by it. The tenant cannot raise the same question again. The tenant has not been entitled to any relief in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Mari Indus lawyer