Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSA versus NAHEEDA MAI

Section 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 dissolution of marriage on the basis of the condition that the wife shall not claim her husband's claim for the return of the marriage benefits from the husband. The court did not say that he had given any benefit to his wife. His bald statement that he has spent a certain amount of money on the marriage ceremony, as well as claiming more than the amount of the husband's door, cannot be accepted in the absence of any other reliable material, separation from Khulla. In this case, it would be malicious, but it would still be justified to insist that she demand the return of the gifts given to the wife at the wedding, but the husband usually cannot claim that he or she was present at the wedding ceremony. A certain amount of money was spent and Khulla will be drafted. The said refund, if accepted, would frustrate the Muslim woman's right to sue Khulla Trial Court, despite the husband's failure to provide evidence that he had married her at the time of marriage. Had given some gifts to his wife. Khulla provided that the wife would not claim her husband's money from her husband. It was considered sufficient for the approval of the decree to dissolve the marriage on the basis of the husband's wife, therefore, he was not entitled to claim the money spent on the marriage ceremony for the wife. immigration advocates contact from Utror lawyer