SHAH ZAMAN versus SHER AFZAL KHAN
Sections 540A and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 430/506/148/149, the defendant was employed by the accused in Saudi Arabia and was earning his living and in this case by his lawyer. It was represented by. Satisfied with this, the circumstances and the satisfaction of the accused's failure to appear on every date of the proceedings or hearing of this case were based on the purpose that the complainant applied to stop or stop the accused in Saudi Arabia. The CCPC's application was rejected in the circumstances in which the objects, purposes and considerations of Section 555A were negated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Khushal Kot lawyer
