ABDUL QAYYUM versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION SHALIMAR, LAHORE
Ditto was arrested by the police officer on the basis of the complainant's request for a Section 491 Amendment Code (XLV of 1860), section 457/380 habeas corpus, but did not show his formal arrest in the Daily Diary as required by the Police Act. Gone. According to the information, the first requirement of the section of 5 of the clause was not fulfilled, CRPC al-magistrate, without consciously exercising his right mind, appeared before police under section ly1, CRPC. Was blinded and remanded, resulting in gross abuse. The arrest of justice and the summoning of the other two persons mentioned in the petition, therefore, were illegal and as a result they were set free to prevent the police from seeking further investigation. , Which is why the petition was accepted with costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Thana Bula Khan lawyer
