SOJHRO KHAN versus GHULAM MURTAZA
Section 2 Q2 law was allowed to appeal the evidence on this basis, even though this evidence (Article 10 (1984) of 1984), Article 17 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 85 (3) was allowed to appeal. Whether the conviction is sustainable or not. On the basis of the ocular testimony of a witness, permitted by the testimony of the law, 1984, Article 17 (2), in which no limit was given to the number of witnesses and whether the eyewitness testimony was relevant and relevant. Despite being labeled, the conviction of the accused can still be sustained. On this basis, unless it is proved that every such witness is unauthorized for the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kahuta lawyer