Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SOJHRO KHAN versus GHULAM MURTAZA


Section 2 Q2 law was allowed to appeal the evidence on this basis, even though this evidence (Article 10 (1984) of 1984), Article 17 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 85 (3) was allowed to appeal. Whether the conviction is sustainable or not. On the basis of the ocular testimony of a witness, permitted by the testimony of the law, 1984, Article 17 (2), in which no limit was given to the number of witnesses and whether the eyewitness testimony was relevant and relevant. Despite being labeled, the conviction of the accused can still be sustained. On this basis, unless it is proved that every such witness is unauthorized for the accused

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
inheritance advocates near Kahuta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.