MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (MALE), SARGODHA
Section 4 Appeals Against Sacked Employees Government employees were not only convicted of domestic misconduct, but were also convicted of moral misconduct as civil servants, illegally admitting happiness before the proceedings. Heard and failed to the extent possible for a civil servant. No irregularities or illegality were disclosed in the record to challenge the sentence imposed; the judicial proceedings against the appellant indicate any legal impairment or impairment in the wrong orders passed by the respondents. Failure to do so, which was the case, was found guilty of illegally taking a civil servant. Thus, satiety was dismissed from the job, the allegations of gross misconduct, misconduct and morals against the public servant were fully justified, as they did not deserve any relaxation. The appeal against dismissal was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Rohri lawyer
