ASGHAR ALI versus STATE
Criminal Code (CR PC Session) Clause No. 4040 & fresh fresh2, after recording new evidence, according to the rules of the law, the accused is not only entitled to fragment and examine witnesses against them. Rather, the order of the appellate court in this regard was clear in the order that the accused was prejudiced after the trial court's failure to disclose because he relied on the evidence to bring the conviction and consequently sentenced the accused. Was set aside and a trial was issued. The trial court decided to examine the pieces of evidence recently filed against the accused under Section 222, CRPC, and proceed further according to the direction given in the first order of remand.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Astore lawyer
