Find a Lawyer

I.TA. NO. 21/LB/1985-86, DECIDED ON 10TH SEPTEMBER, 1989. versus I.TA. NO. 21/LB/1985-86, DECIDED ON 10TH SEPTEMBER, 1989.

Supplemental certified copies of the supplementary orders of RAM 10 and 11, together with the appeal memorandum, required Appellant Rule 11 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1981 to be certified without merging the certified copies of invalid orders. Copies of unclean orders linking to the appeal memorandum will not be considered to be in compliance with any of the provisions of the above rules, because if the ordinance does not comply with the provisions of the ordinance, the appellants Deleted on infringement. Since it was filed in an ambiguous manner on an unclear basis famous lower court advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer