Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD PARVEZ versus S.H.O.


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/482/486/272/273 Food Stuffs (Control) Act (XX of 1958), Termination of section 3/6 FIR is serious. There were allegations, and the matter was still under investigation, with several people from the area swearing under oaths that the accused had no connection to the allegations leveled against them and the allegations were baseless. Are, when the stage still could not be trusted. The accused will be charged under investigation, according to the law, the investigating officer will have the freedom to present his views for his views; no case of interference has come up, the circumstances of the accused's request for termination of FIR I was excluded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.