JAFFER BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. versus RESOURCE MOBILISATION AND TAX REFORMS COMMISSION
Contract Act 1872 Section 2 (h) of the open bid contract for the purchase of computer machines by the bidder (applicant) has submitted that the contract to the seller was illegal and indirect because the successful bidder respondent department And in this case, the consultant was secretly appointed before issuing the tender to the seller and the fact was in the knowledge of the applicants who did not object to the submission of their bid. The seller's presence as a seller can cause the petitioner to prejudice or benefit the seller. Comes. After participating in the bid with all material facts notice, they could not object to the authenticity of the bid process after failing to obtain the contract and the seller's offered prices for his computer system were submitted by the applicant. About 40% lower than the prices. The acceptance of such seller's bid was not only legitimate but also in the interest of the public as well as the treasury given to the seller was absolutely legal and mandatory.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
