Find a Lawyer

GUL HASSAN BROHI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (1) Pakistan Army Act Rules, Section 13 and 112 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The definition of evidence on which the accused was convicted cannot be called a confessional statement. The statement of the accused was also not recorded in the presence of the accused and under this section 342, CRPC, the accused was also required to appear before the accused in violation of Rules 13 and 112 of Pak Army. Was not done The Rules of the Act, the non-examination of a lost investigating officer whose evidence was of paramount importance, also prejudiced the defense proceedings before the Summary Military Court, thus, the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction suffered and according to law Fully Constitutional application allowed jobs for fresh advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer