ELAHI BAKHSH versus BALQEES BEGUM
The pre-emption case for filing a case for pre-discrimination claim under section 3030 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1930, whether filed within the limits, has been found by the High Court to show that the shopkeepers already had land as a tenant. Occupation, prior to the sale in their favor, occurred in 1972, when there was no physical change to the possession when the vendor acknowledged the sale transaction with the Revenue Officer, who previously served as notice for the umpire. Is: Thus, the date of confirmation of sale was the relevant date for calculating the period of 16 2 1972, under section 30, Punjab Prevention Act, 1913. When the pre-trial threshold was considered to be the start of the round-the-clock 1972, the suit was presented temporarily before the prosecutor (the Judicial Officer was on leave) before the prosecutor. There was no exception to the plaint in 1973, which, by notification of the District Judge, authorized to receive the plaintiff in the area, the Presiding Officer of the Civil Court Plaintiff in the Emissions suit from time to time presented. has been
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Layyah lawyer