Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN BIBI versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA

Defendant's first request for delayed termination of O IX, R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 14 of the previous Order, the result of the appearance and absence of the parties to the Civil Procedure Code Order IX of CPC Is. The former party decree 179 1988 shall presume to know at least the date of the former party decree, ie 179 1988, if not earlier, the defendant withdrew such application and in 912 1989 the former party decree Another request for exclusion has been canceled. Thirty days were left to apply for the separation of the order but he made the second application after a long period of first application, even if there was a flaw in the earlier application for which he withdrew. If it was, it was the plaintiff's fault and she could not take advantage of her wrongdoing. There is no good reason for the delayed condolences under Section 5 and 14, the Limitation Act, 1908, that the trial court dismissed the defendant. It was permissible to issue the former party decree based on the limitations of the NT application immigration advocates phone number from Jhand lawyer